The 'Nobel' Thing To Do

I recently stumbled upon a troubling report, one that's pretty rank with controversy.

It turns out that Nobel prize winner James Watson, credited for helping discover DNA's double helix, is not only a scientist - he's a racist.

Apparently Watson put down both the intelligence and employment ethics of African Americans in this country.

My verdict towards Watson: disgraceful, and not so smart a statement from a seemingly brilliant man.

However, I don't believe the lecture Watson was scheduled to give at a British museum should have been canceled because of this. While disgraceful, it is a matter entirely separate from nucleic acids.

If we in academia are going to bar racist scientists from our students, should we not have to bar fascist leaders, presidents of countries with terrorist tendencies, or morally imperfect senators from also speaking at lectures, presentations, and graduation ceremonies?

The truth of the matter is, America and the international stage is developing a mindset that, although not as shocking as the racist remarks presented in this case, might be just as close-minded. As long as someone's personal business does not interfere with their presentations (for instance, as long as Clinton doesn't hit on the Metropolitan intern, or offer to take her to coffee near Rodin's statue) then why should we ban them from the spread of knowledge, which is the only way to enhance learning - especially in a society where learning isn't as lauded as it used to be?

Thumbs down for Watson for his impish remarks; but thumbs-down in turn to the museum for canceling his lecture.